{"dragByHandle":true,"dragByBody":false,"cssSelector":"ql-thumbnail","widgetClass":"OverlayWidget","bindings":{"bind0":{"element":".ql-thumbnail .Quicklook .trigger","type":"quicklookselected","fn":"function(){$.fnProxy(arguments,\'#headerOverlay\',OverlayWidget.show,\'OverlayWidget.show\');}"}},"effectOnHide":"blind","effectOnShowOptions":"{direction:\"up\"}","effectOnHideOptions":"{direction:\"down\"}","closeOnBackgroundClick":true,"effectOnShowSpeed":"300","onScreenPadding":10,"allowOffScreenOverlay":false,"captureClicks":true,"effectOnShow":"blind","effectOnHideSpeed":"300"}

Search...

Get Exclusive Savings, Free Shiping offers, Fashion News & More

Plus, get 20% off a future purchase when you sign up to receive Lane Bryant email

Thank You

20% savings are in your future!

You'll receive an email in just a few days, so watch your inbox for the promo code and details.

X

Style has no borders

Please select your country and currency to make shopping easier.

select country & currency or ship to the U.S.

close

Real Women Dollars
X null

Lane Collection petal print blouse

BUY 1 GET 1 50% OFF
This item is completely sold out.
SURPLICE SHELL

  • Item #158444
  • Polyester
  • Machine Wash
  • Imported
  • 32
  • 14 / 16:26 / 28
Lane Collection petal print blouse 4.2 5 5 5
too big The print and faric are lovely but the gather at the waist is too blousy. Makes me look bigger. I returned. April 12, 2013
Took it right to the alterations shop It is gorgeous, the color is very rich, and feels great, but like others have said it gaps in the front. For $4 I had the gap sewed shut and now love it. I've gotten several compliments. March 16, 2013
BEAUTIFUL COLOR NICE FOR DQY TO NIGHT WEAR AND EASY TO WASH AND WEAR March 3, 2013
Prettier in person This blouse is well-made and the rose pattern is more beautiful in person. It will look good over a skirt or under a blazer. The fabric is really beautiful. Like other reviewers, I had to take a few stitches on the front to keep the gap from gaping open, but someone with smaller breasts probably wouldn't have this problem. February 28, 2013
2 next>>